The Superior Council of the Federation of Bar Associations in view of the serious crisis of legality by which traverses the Republic considers it appropriate to address the public the following approaches: First
. Sometimes the effective power of a society gets its basis for action in different instances of the law. The proceedings of the Executive Branch reliably verify that this is the case of Venezuela. It has supplanted the objective regularity of the law by erratic whims of those who actually hold power, because while it has the legal powers as President, awarded through the respective election is not entitled to act only at the end of will occupy the bodies that are outside their areas of choice. Second
. The division of the bodies or branches of government, giving each a specific powers must be exercised independently, is one of the main features of a democratic regime is a system of mutual control that each body exerts on another. This principle is not respected in the country. Third
. A regime which has as its goal the realization of a democratic state based on legality, and take for himself all the powers of state bodies, is defined as a system characterized by arbitrary rule. Fourth
. The proof of the above with regard to the legislative branch is clearly demonstrated by the passage of legislation by the National Assembly, which formed part of the proposal rejected by the Venezuelan people in the referendum of December 2007. Laws which violate the Constitution neglected the massive popular rejection. Fifth
. Regarding the judiciary, the Supreme Court demonstrates its lack of independence to obey the wishes of the President of the Republic, to recognize the organic nature of the decrees issued by the Executive, although only have this status laws as determined by the Constitution or a majority of two thirds of the National Assembly, according to the Article 203 of the Constitution, conditions exist in these legislative proposals. Among many other things, violate the Constitution because it allows expropriation of property without a warrant for occupancy; politicized the National Armed Forces to be at the service of a single-party political thought, by institutionalizing the ominous theme of content that ends with word "death" creates a new component or armed force: the Bolivarian National Militia. All these abuses from the initiative of the Presidency of the Republic illegally converted into law, instead of being declared unconstitutional were accepted by the Supreme Court, giving the character organic law. This has added the erroneous assimilation of international tribunals with jurisdiction in Venezuela based on valid treaties and conventions with foreign courts simply do not enjoy such status, all in satisfaction with the course isolationist speech of the head of the National Executive. Sixth
. Of the other supposedly independent bodies, highlight the acts issued by the Comptroller General of the Republic, such as prohibitions clearly illegal and unconstitutional policy, citizens who aspired to elective office in the 2008 elections, as it only applies to "... who have been convicted for crimes committed during the course of their duties "under Article 65 of the Constitution, a condition not fulfilled. The Public Prosecutor has shown over and over again its unrestricted obedience to the orders of the President of the Republic, the end justify the anti-institutional approach of ordering proceed to comply with what the President believes it is his duty: "... the President has the power to encourage other state bodies, "was the meek response of the Attorney General. The National Electoral Council has clearly demonstrated a submissive attitude, to the extent that totally ignored the National Assembly the draft electoral law proposed by this body to approve a system of proportional representation which denies the benefit of the scheme. Finally, the Ombudsman, is known as an institution totally irrelevant, given the arbitrary daily demonstrations against citizens by state agencies. Seventh
. The path of social and legal state under Article 2 of the Constitution, is disrupted for a purpose that seeks to impose an authoritarian socialism, imitation of a Marxist-Leninist dictatorship of sponsoring a violent change of government structures. Instead of opting for the alternative of democratic socialism, exemplified in many governments in Latin America and Europe, we chose the route of the illegal imposition of ideas and practices at odds with a regime of freedoms. And the first thing is to make the top executive to meet these aims, is to engage all decision makers, which already achieved proven, making the powers that should control the activity of the Executive, and robots are their obedient staff. Eighth
. This is the first step towards the establishment of a dictatorial regime characterized by irregular and capricious command of who holds power. If we add a country in which huge groups of people living in poverty critical in poverty, that public safety is non-existent, with Venezuela being the most violent country in Latin America, with 14,530 homicides in 2008, that the Executive has ordered the fabulous sum of 830,300 million dollars in the decade although this has had a visible effect on the population, in contrast, formal employment has decreased and our currency suffered a major inflation in the world, that corruption infects every organ mass public wealth to be patent agents who hold high State, which still get the criminal complicity alleged inaction by the Comptroller General, the Public Ministry and the courts justice, which has criminalized the free exercise of the legal profession, qualifying as a simple crime allegations in cases where public interest has been expressed and impudently the President. Before
described: First
. We warn the people of Venezuela on the total illegitimacy which governs the Republic, through policy instruments that do not meet the minimum conditions required by the Constitution and laws. Second
. We urge other professional associations that make life in the country to speak at this grave risk in Venezuela. Third
. Call to establish a campaign, within legal parameters, to demonstrate the reality of the current regime, to the Venezuelan population, which is to be performed on each Bar Association of the Republic, through lectures, seminars, conferences, highlighting the values \u200b\u200bof genuine democracy. Fourth
. Schedule a massive campaign to highlight the importance of will to correct the authoritarianism that prevails in our country, the upcoming elections to the National Assembly, a body that has within its powers to designate the composition of the Supreme Court and appoint the Attorney General, the Comptroller General, the Ombudsman and members of the National Electoral Council. A favorable change toward democratic currents within the National Assembly, is the first step of Venezuela to rescue liberty and the institutional losses.
. Sometimes the effective power of a society gets its basis for action in different instances of the law. The proceedings of the Executive Branch reliably verify that this is the case of Venezuela. It has supplanted the objective regularity of the law by erratic whims of those who actually hold power, because while it has the legal powers as President, awarded through the respective election is not entitled to act only at the end of will occupy the bodies that are outside their areas of choice. Second
. The division of the bodies or branches of government, giving each a specific powers must be exercised independently, is one of the main features of a democratic regime is a system of mutual control that each body exerts on another. This principle is not respected in the country. Third
. A regime which has as its goal the realization of a democratic state based on legality, and take for himself all the powers of state bodies, is defined as a system characterized by arbitrary rule. Fourth
. The proof of the above with regard to the legislative branch is clearly demonstrated by the passage of legislation by the National Assembly, which formed part of the proposal rejected by the Venezuelan people in the referendum of December 2007. Laws which violate the Constitution neglected the massive popular rejection. Fifth
. Regarding the judiciary, the Supreme Court demonstrates its lack of independence to obey the wishes of the President of the Republic, to recognize the organic nature of the decrees issued by the Executive, although only have this status laws as determined by the Constitution or a majority of two thirds of the National Assembly, according to the Article 203 of the Constitution, conditions exist in these legislative proposals. Among many other things, violate the Constitution because it allows expropriation of property without a warrant for occupancy; politicized the National Armed Forces to be at the service of a single-party political thought, by institutionalizing the ominous theme of content that ends with word "death" creates a new component or armed force: the Bolivarian National Militia. All these abuses from the initiative of the Presidency of the Republic illegally converted into law, instead of being declared unconstitutional were accepted by the Supreme Court, giving the character organic law. This has added the erroneous assimilation of international tribunals with jurisdiction in Venezuela based on valid treaties and conventions with foreign courts simply do not enjoy such status, all in satisfaction with the course isolationist speech of the head of the National Executive. Sixth
. Of the other supposedly independent bodies, highlight the acts issued by the Comptroller General of the Republic, such as prohibitions clearly illegal and unconstitutional policy, citizens who aspired to elective office in the 2008 elections, as it only applies to "... who have been convicted for crimes committed during the course of their duties "under Article 65 of the Constitution, a condition not fulfilled. The Public Prosecutor has shown over and over again its unrestricted obedience to the orders of the President of the Republic, the end justify the anti-institutional approach of ordering proceed to comply with what the President believes it is his duty: "... the President has the power to encourage other state bodies, "was the meek response of the Attorney General. The National Electoral Council has clearly demonstrated a submissive attitude, to the extent that totally ignored the National Assembly the draft electoral law proposed by this body to approve a system of proportional representation which denies the benefit of the scheme. Finally, the Ombudsman, is known as an institution totally irrelevant, given the arbitrary daily demonstrations against citizens by state agencies. Seventh
. The path of social and legal state under Article 2 of the Constitution, is disrupted for a purpose that seeks to impose an authoritarian socialism, imitation of a Marxist-Leninist dictatorship of sponsoring a violent change of government structures. Instead of opting for the alternative of democratic socialism, exemplified in many governments in Latin America and Europe, we chose the route of the illegal imposition of ideas and practices at odds with a regime of freedoms. And the first thing is to make the top executive to meet these aims, is to engage all decision makers, which already achieved proven, making the powers that should control the activity of the Executive, and robots are their obedient staff. Eighth
. This is the first step towards the establishment of a dictatorial regime characterized by irregular and capricious command of who holds power. If we add a country in which huge groups of people living in poverty critical in poverty, that public safety is non-existent, with Venezuela being the most violent country in Latin America, with 14,530 homicides in 2008, that the Executive has ordered the fabulous sum of 830,300 million dollars in the decade although this has had a visible effect on the population, in contrast, formal employment has decreased and our currency suffered a major inflation in the world, that corruption infects every organ mass public wealth to be patent agents who hold high State, which still get the criminal complicity alleged inaction by the Comptroller General, the Public Ministry and the courts justice, which has criminalized the free exercise of the legal profession, qualifying as a simple crime allegations in cases where public interest has been expressed and impudently the President. Before
described: First
. We warn the people of Venezuela on the total illegitimacy which governs the Republic, through policy instruments that do not meet the minimum conditions required by the Constitution and laws. Second
. We urge other professional associations that make life in the country to speak at this grave risk in Venezuela. Third
. Call to establish a campaign, within legal parameters, to demonstrate the reality of the current regime, to the Venezuelan population, which is to be performed on each Bar Association of the Republic, through lectures, seminars, conferences, highlighting the values \u200b\u200bof genuine democracy. Fourth
. Schedule a massive campaign to highlight the importance of will to correct the authoritarianism that prevails in our country, the upcoming elections to the National Assembly, a body that has within its powers to designate the composition of the Supreme Court and appoint the Attorney General, the Comptroller General, the Ombudsman and members of the National Electoral Council. A favorable change toward democratic currents within the National Assembly, is the first step of Venezuela to rescue liberty and the institutional losses.
0 comments:
Post a Comment