1 .- We reject that a high authority of the state, call the Constitution
2 .- The so-called special bill against media crimes criminalize the exercise of freedom of expression and information, when disseminating messages that, among other assumptions, may be characterized as untrue and causing public unrest, anxiety or feeling of insecurity and impunity ", according to the organs of a State which does not leave room for legitimate public criticism nor disclosure of information corroborated that reveal shortcomings in fulfilling the responsibilities of the authorities.
3 .- The proposed project or freedom of expression makes the generic and indeterminate interests of the State, to the extent that this practice would be stripped of its status as a human right, as that its exercise would determine the non-involvement or interest group feelings freely interpreted by state agencies that would become censors. A purported peace or tranquility communications official censorship born absolutely opposes the free flow of ideas and information characteristic of a democracy.
4 .- The recent closure of over thirty radio stations in order of CONATEL, without observing the due process and disrespect for constitutional protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty confirms the policy of occupation ideological spectrum conducted by the government. Invoking pseudo-legal fireworks, the national regulator has taken off the air at stations that had not bowed to government policy hegemony. CONATEL commits the mistake of placing his administrative powers in the field of telecommunications, which are being carried out at the wrong time, over freedom of expression, which openly violates Article 13.3 of
5 .- It is expected the self-censorship or inhibitory effect of these decisions, as that would entail the approval of the 'special bill against media crimes. We call upon the various social sectors to respond civilly, within the constitutional and legal framework against these actions and proposals to further reduce the possibilities of enjoyment of civil rights, while we encourage State agencies to leave the path of the erosion of institutional and open the paths of plural dialogue focused on the highest principles and constitutional values.
Dr. Román Duque Corredor
Jesus M. Casal
UCAB Law School Dean
Ramón Crazut
Dean Faculty of Law and Political UCV
Diana Romero
Faculty of Law and Policy
LIGHT
Juan José Ramos
Dean Faculty of Law and Political Sciences University of Carabobo
Dean Faculty of Law and Political UNIMET
University Law School Dean Monteávila
Jorge Rosell
Raul Arrieta (UCV)
Mirian Rodríguez Reyes (UNIMET )
Angelina Jaffe (UNIMET)
Liliana Fasciani (UCAB)
firms continue ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment