The 1999 Constitution is the subject, almost from the very year of its enactment, of innumerable attacks and timely violations, especially by those who are required to ensure compliance. The continued disregard of the Constitution has questioned its vital importance and highest rank as the supreme norm for certain sectors of Venezuelan society, through interpretation and manipulation that it makes the President, judges and judges of Power Judicial, most of the deputies of the National Assembly and other representatives of other public bodies, who take the principles and constitutional rules as contingency provisions and subject to change depending on the interest, regardless of the legal proceedings.
The government's reluctance to build bridges of reflection and dialogue to the opposition political parties and, in general, all sectors of society seems to have no short term solution. The arrogance of that and the impotence of these are manifested in the disorder, corruption and the dismantling of state institutions, without any possibility of agreement and solve the most pressing problems. The submission of public policy to a particular ideological current as means and end of state policy committed to end the greatest satisfaction of social needs and, therefore, creates a pernicious dependence of citizens with respect to State through a single channel of the government. Membership or the approach to the ruling party almost mandatory as a condition for recognition of certain fundamental rights is one of the most despicable forms of disrespect for human dignity.
The argument from ignorance has no place in a society that lived through the experience of democracy for four decades and is able to distinguish between a defective democracy but freedom of a false democracy without freedom. Assume
inevitable systematic violation of fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution and the forced imposition of a de facto quasi-legislation that contravenes and nullify the principles and provisions enshrined in it, in a sort of ongoing constitutional mutation, citing the ineffectiveness of going before the courts or inaccessibility to the legislature, is tantamount to denying the value and importance of the Constitution. The functional utility of this paper is precisely to establish limits on both the exercise of power as the exercise of the rights and freedoms.
Assume a passive attitude, whether by necessity, and indifference, and by mere opportunism, or perhaps not knowing what to do with the government advanced in its project of transforming society in a socialist commune and obsolete stamp democratic rule of law in a rigid and willful monolith, leads inevitably to a state of servitude that no people should be willing to allow. Condition the solution of problems of municipalities and states across the country to verify the electoral trend in these regions, is discriminatory.
consider the Constitution an instrument for the protection of our rights and guarantee of our democratic freedoms, but in the present circumstances should be understood that it is she who needs to be protected and only we can defend it. M. Liliana Fasciani
The government's reluctance to build bridges of reflection and dialogue to the opposition political parties and, in general, all sectors of society seems to have no short term solution. The arrogance of that and the impotence of these are manifested in the disorder, corruption and the dismantling of state institutions, without any possibility of agreement and solve the most pressing problems. The submission of public policy to a particular ideological current as means and end of state policy committed to end the greatest satisfaction of social needs and, therefore, creates a pernicious dependence of citizens with respect to State through a single channel of the government. Membership or the approach to the ruling party almost mandatory as a condition for recognition of certain fundamental rights is one of the most despicable forms of disrespect for human dignity.
The argument from ignorance has no place in a society that lived through the experience of democracy for four decades and is able to distinguish between a defective democracy but freedom of a false democracy without freedom. Assume
inevitable systematic violation of fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution and the forced imposition of a de facto quasi-legislation that contravenes and nullify the principles and provisions enshrined in it, in a sort of ongoing constitutional mutation, citing the ineffectiveness of going before the courts or inaccessibility to the legislature, is tantamount to denying the value and importance of the Constitution. The functional utility of this paper is precisely to establish limits on both the exercise of power as the exercise of the rights and freedoms.
Assume a passive attitude, whether by necessity, and indifference, and by mere opportunism, or perhaps not knowing what to do with the government advanced in its project of transforming society in a socialist commune and obsolete stamp democratic rule of law in a rigid and willful monolith, leads inevitably to a state of servitude that no people should be willing to allow. Condition the solution of problems of municipalities and states across the country to verify the electoral trend in these regions, is discriminatory.
consider the Constitution an instrument for the protection of our rights and guarantee of our democratic freedoms, but in the present circumstances should be understood that it is she who needs to be protected and only we can defend it. M. Liliana Fasciani
0 comments:
Post a Comment