Queen Mattress Cargo Van

Press

The Red Defense Constitution expresses its strongest protest against the measures taken by CONATEL against civil organizations CEDICE Asoesfuerzo and who have been spreading in various radio and television stations, a advertising campaign called " In Defense of the Right to Private Property " showing some evidence and criteria that seek to highlight and protect certain attributes of the right private property, as well as any public policy question that can ignore this right.

Following the disclosure of these ads, CONATEL has initiated a punitive procedure against these organizations and the media that broadcast, claiming that they could be inciting to crime, public order disturbances and be attacking security the nation. The procedure not only aims to impose meaningful sanctions, but also seeks to silence legitimate messages, peaceful and necessary in a democratic and pluralistic society, to the extent that the only initiation, issued CONATEL a precautionary measure arbitrary and without justification, through which imposes prior censorship by prohibiting the disclosure of such advertising, and any other similar, while a proceeding is pending.

CONATEL

These measures constitute a flagrant violation of the right to freedom of expression and information enshrined in Articles 57 and 58 the Constitution and Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits specifically the establishment of censorship, why can not prohibit the broadcast of a message, but there is a final decision. At the same time, with this arbitrary measure will not only prevent these organizations to spread their ideas, but also deprives the Venezuelan society to receive and weigh these messages, which in any way incite violence or public disorder. This prevents that is the very society that is convinced, without government interference, the benefits or harm of certain public policies.

Also, this measure prior censorship threatens the very essence of a democratic society, because it imposes the need to tolerate a diversity of ideas and dissenting opinions, especially when they are justified and framed in explicitly recognized norms and values by the Constitution. For It is therefore logical and appropriate that there is scope to open a broad debate on issues of public interest, which excludes the possibility of banning the dissemination of ideas that are uncomfortable and even offensive to the government.

The inaccuracies or exaggerations that the government attributes to the messages that have been spreading these civil society organizations must be fought with ideas, not with clamps or procedures to inhibit public debate. Silence an opinion in an unreal and nonexistent danger of disorderly conduct is an intolerable restriction on the free expression of thought, menos en una sociedad democrática.

Además, es claro que el solo inicio de estos procedimientos genera un efecto inhibitorio en el resto de la sociedad, lo que se traduce en una autocensura, pues es lógico pensar que muchas personas u organizaciones se verán cohibidas de expresar sus ideas y opiniones, frente a la posibilidad de ser sancionados o perseguidos por entes gubernamentales.

Hacemos un llamado a las autoridades y tribunales competentes, a los fines de que den preferencia a los valores constitucionales que promueve el derecho a la libertad de expresión, y en consecuencia se deje sin efecto cualquier mecanismo directo o indirecto de censura previa, que pretenda inhibir el libre debate de ideas.

Rafael Chavero

Professor

UCAB

Jesús María Casal

Dean, Faculty of Law UCAB

Jose Roman Duque Corredor

President Academy of Political and Social Sciences

Fotóbol Animáé

Curiepe and defend the Constitution

"is that we wanted to take away our rights celebrate religious festival of our Patron, our tradition of drums and take away police to protect us, without even asking. This is an abuse . "

how are you phrases collected independent media social events in Curiepe when Guard National sought leave to Miranda State Police facilities have always busy, and the inhabitants of this population expressed to Mirandinos justify his public protest against what they considered an affront to rights citizens and neighbors, and an excessive use of force military.

You can not miss this done. Indeed, it spontaneous protest, and his character clearly equally popular and its rationale: defending a rights understood as inalienable, as defense was invoked as a justification for protest. addition of the values \u200b\u200b are involved in human rights. is to say, cultural freedom and religious and citizens' rights decide about protection and personal safety. And undoubtedly the defense against what is considered as an arbitrary by the injury to those rights and values. All this in a region described as "Afro Venezuelan" where popular origin is indisputable and where the feeling of freedom historically has always been present . Curiepe marked a historic event to an example of a community united in defending their fundamental rights.

was the community which reacted because an event whose consequences they foresaw who arranged the evacuation the state police forces. Indeed, first, there was a collective sense that this impersonation perceived as arbitrary against the same community and not as a political conflict between state and national authorities. Rather than defending a Governor to whom you are severing its powers there was a reaction to what the community judged as eliminating a police which was consubstantial and a lack of respect for religious tradition and cultural, when chosen for eviction day of their patron saint and folk festivals, which altered the life of society. Second, that sentiment resulted in a spontaneous and unplanned protest as a defense of the same community has called of abuse of power. is to say, the imposition of a measure of elimination of a public service, without being consulted. In other words, the defense its right to participate and intervene in decisions directly affecting a the members of the community. And thirdly, popular sentiment that more meaning than a protest against an abusive use of force armed what was at stake were their individual and collective rights that nobody can ignore them or take away.

In this vein defense of constitutional rights, safeguard the constitutional principle is that public safety in times of peace, is an activity character civilian, not military; as follows from Article 332 of the Constitution , as the replacement of police state and municipal National Guard, which is a component of the National Armed Forces, contradicts the principle of security private citizen because it confuses this security with national defense, which is a military principle. Safety first this citizen was ratified by the people in the referendum of December 2007, when he rejected the reform Articles 328 and 329 of the Constitution that intended to militarize public safety , Assigning the function itself of the Force Army National civilian police activity.

Román J. Duque Corredor

President Academy of Political and Social Sciences

Write Something Funny Wedding Card

Defending the guarantee of judicial independence in Barquisimeto

True or not, the truth is that the statements criminal court on 17 July this year reported that pressure to issue precautionary measures in the process followed to Globovision president put again demonstrated it is crucial that the independence of judges for compliance with the Constitution . For So more than a right of judges, their independence is a guarantee of citizens because of free exercise of the function of administering justice depends on effective judicial protection of constitutional rights. It and the Constitution held accountable to all judges, starting by the Supreme Court of Justice, to ensure its integrity and ensure its supremacy and effectiveness. To do this requires a justice system free from pressure.

Indeed, without an independent judiciary courts are simple servers orders of the other branches. Our country has seen examples of these deplorable attacks fundamental rights without the courts have repaired these lesions constitutional because, as recognized by non-governmental organizations, national and international - by the pressures and fears that are subject, are not uncommon removals of judges simply because to prove freedom of opinion at the time of issuing decisions on matters of interest to government officials. Some of these cases have reached international bodies have recognized this, whose decisions are then defaulted to the simplistic and passed sovereignty argument national, when compliance is not only an express mandate of constitutional law, but also an international commitment, precisely guarantee fundamental rights.

Venezuela has joined the group of countries who ignore the court system inter-American human rights protection, with aggravating the paradigmatic case is precisely the contempt decision Court American Human Rights ruled on the violation of due jurisdictional due process and independence and tenure of judges. The failure of this constitutional guarantee of the independence of Judicial Branch is not confined to judges, but citizens , because to the extent that those are see their freedom curtailed to decide, can not be doubt that the fundamental rights of citizens themselves are affected. palpable demonstration of this is in addition to dismissal of judges who assert independence, also judicial decisions in clear violation of the rules of law are held to underpin administrative measures clearly unconstitutional, or to dispose resources or actions by any reason Formal not give entry proceedings against the State . Suffice point decisions against workers, unions, professional associations, educators, parents and agents, producers, entrepreneurs traders, journalists and governors and mayors unofficial among other decisions.

The worst of this situation represents frequent violations constitutional right of presumption of innocence and its principal manifestation of the free trial, that the Attorney General and that criminal justice has virtually repealed to convert these rights into exceptions , rather than the rule in respect of guarantees of personal liberty. Today in Venezuela the principle is the low trial deprivation of liberty. The prisons are full of processed and not convicted. In this situation of attacks against the due process and ensuring the independence also cover common cases deferral hearings in criminal cases that extend the periods custody of more beyond the legal and constitutional lapses allowed. And more serious still indefinite extension for writing by writing the sentences whose devices have been announced orally in criminal trials, preventing the accused exercised the appropriate resources. also impunity for the violation of right to privacy official media and pro-government legislators , to intercept and disseminate talks particular show the state of prostration of Public Ministry and institutional absence the People's Advocate. And in terms of control of legality and constitutionality are pathetic latest statistical data show that in 2007 and 2008, on average, only 1.50% of the decisions the Supreme Court, in constitutional and lawful, favored the rights of individuals.

Indeed, anyone can be convinced with the argument that public authorities do not comment illegal or unconstitutional, or work to perfection, or lawyers are less able . For the contrary, the fact is that these decisions are now more deferens or complacent with the government, when are controlled by the ruling (Canova González , Antonio, "The of Reality Administrative Venezuela, Caracas, 2009).

Specifically, the defense of the independence of the courts is a guarantee of civil rights rather than a privilege of judges, because depends on their respect judicial custody fundamental rights, so the defense independence Judicial Branch should be in a major activity in the platform of "Defense the Constitution. "

invite Friends the Red to report and comment on these cases of attacks on judicial independence.

Jesús María Casal

Dean of Law UCAB

Román J. Duque Corredor

President of the Academy Políctias and Social Sciences.

List Oftech Deck Brands

Forum and meeting with community leaders

Network Defense of the Constitution continues expand, this time confirmed his release and work in Barquisimeto, Lara State, in a meeting held on Thursday 16 July at Bar Barquisimeto. Also had an interesting meeting with community leaders.

Forum Ad in the local press

reviews and pictures of the act

Running With A Period

Defending the right of political conflict

The Red Defense Constitution, before announcement of some official spokesmen of the enactment of a Education Act establish a model educational accordance with the principles of a socialist state, warns that constitutionally content fundamental right to education, such as the right of parents to choose the kind of education for their children and persons to found educational establishments, are inherent rights, and that not be affected by political reasons or ideological, or conditioned to a certain unilaterally ideological thinking, even though education is a public service which is regulated by the State. Every citizen has the fundamental right to an education commensurate with their principles, traditions and culture whose amplitude, continuity, freedom and quality are preferably obligations of the state, but without imposing ways of thinking and acting. For its nature of fundamental right, education is a factor of development of the people, what you is inherent in the dignity educated freely, it that should facilitate and not hinder or family, or the society or the state, by what their regulation must be the product of a social pact and not an imposition state, so that its regulation should represent a joint effort to enable more and better education .

The public and private education are therefore manifestations of right of access to education and entitled to receive a quality education , so there should be no discrimination between educational models for political, social , economic or ideological. For the contrary, the education as a fundamental right is a means to promote democratic society which our Constitution calls for the ultimate goal of the overhaul of Republic, consistent with the values \u200b\u200band goals of higher state democratic social Law and Justice; protection life, freedom, justice, equality, solidarity, democracy, social responsibility , the preeminence of human rights, ethics and pluralism. A educational system our society can not be tied to single thoughts without violating the constitutional axiology before indicated. Therefore, the right to education that contracts Article 103 of the Constitution must guarantee the state through the election right of each citizen rate education they want and the right enjoy a private and public education, comprehensive and quality, equal opportunities, without further limitations than those derived from the aptitudes, vocation and aspirations.

It grounds, the right to education violates when prevents equal access or remain in the educational system, students discriminate between the type of institution educational prevents the participation of parents, guardians and teachers in decisions that affect the community educational, or applied controls that prevent the free operation of establishments educational. Accordingly, the State attentive against the right to education when in its regulation destroys educational freedom is its substance.

Freedom education includes the freedom of parents to choose the education to be taught to their children , academic freedom, freedom research, academic freedom, freedom of expression and opinion, religious freedom in educational establishments, the right participation of the community educational in decisions that affect and university autonomy. Moreover, the regulation of public service education as regards inspection and monitoring, must respect the essential content of right to education, particularly freedom of education, freedom of thought and right educational community participation. And should promote academic excellence and career ensuring the stability of teachers.

Finally, constitutionally , the right to education, for its humanistic content, requires a true national plan comprehensive and excellent education, the result of free and spontaneous participation and not imposed statist that commits state and society, so as not to affect the dignity of people in their right to think freely.

For this reason, the Red Defense the Constitution warns citizens about the harmful to punish an Education Act which disregards the right to education by the imposition of a model ideological education.

Jesús María Casal

Dean of the Faculty of Law UCAB

Román J. Duque Corredor

President Academy of Sciences Political and Social

The Best Of Bang Bros

education and democratic dialogue

Savanna Samson In Streaming

Declaration against possible threats to journalists

We express to the public our outrage at the potential threats have been directed against journalists for coverage perform judicial source and ask questions framed within the legitimate exercise of their profession. We remind the authorities that in a democracy should be subject to constant public scrutiny and that journalists are only a conduit for the concerns of society in the country's problems. We call for correction or clarification of the meaning of the words uttered by the President of the Supreme Court following a question put to him by the journalist Vanessa Gómez Quiroz, to restore a positive climate for the exercise of journalism in the judiciary. Jesus M.

Casal
UCAB Law School Dean Román Duque Corredor


President of the Academy of Political and Social Sciences

Cheat Engine Chickens Invaders

Declaration of Deans and university professors

the undersigned, Deans and Professors of Colleges of Law and Political Sciences University of the country, Individuals Number Academy of Political and Social Sciences, and members of the Center for Constitutional Studies School of Law and Policy Central University of Venezuela, during the academic gathering to defend the Constitution convened on June 29, 2009, aimed to establish a position on the national status, we do it in these terms:

1. - The Constitution is primarily a legal rule designed to recognize and guarantee human rights and assumes a principle of community integration. The Constitution should be the plural platform on which citizens of all shades can find for the joint construction of our future. The failure or misrepresentation of the Constitution weakens the institutional fabric and opens the door to arbitrariness.

2 .- 02 December 2007, the Venezuelan people expressed in a referendum refers to his rejection of a concrete proposal for constitutional reform. Despite the rejection he got such a proposal, the President of the Republic and National Assembly insisted on it, the first through Decree with Force of Law in 2008, and the second by laws issued this year as the Organic Law Reorganization of the Internal Market of Liquid Fuels, the Law Reserving to the State Property and Services Primary Activities Related to Oil and Organic Law of the petrochemical assets, approved without having completed the public consultation required by the Constitution with virtually no parliamentary debate and undermine the rights to economic freedom and property Private, with serious damage also to the enjoyment of social rights of workers .

3 .- The President of the Republic aims to set the "XXI Century Socialism" and the "New Geometría del Poder”, violentando la voluntad popular con el auxilio de la Asamblea Nacional. Ello se ha puesto de manifiesto, además de en decretos-leyes ya promulgados, en proyectos de ley que están siendo tramitados ante dicha Asamblea, entre los cuales se destacan: el Proyecto de Ley Orgánica para la Ordenación y Gestión del Territorio ; el Proyecto de Ley de Reforma de la Ley de los Consejos Comunales; el Proyecto de Ley de Propiedad Social; el Proyecto de Ley Orgánica de Educación, el Proyecto de Ley de Cooperación Internacional y el Proyecto de Ley Orgánica de Procesos Electorales. Lo mismo ocurrió with the laws and subsequent acts implementing centralized constitutionally enshrined as exclusive powers of the States. The will of the people was also unknown Special Law on the Organization and the Capital District and other regulatory instruments associated with it, which curtailed the scope of the metropolitan authority elected by the people, to deliver substantially otherwise designated by the President of the Republic , thereby also breaking the political-territorial unit in the city of Caracas.

4 .- The State recognized the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is neither socialist nor liberal, neither capitalist nor Marxist, is "democratic and social state of law and justice." The State can not be appropriated by a ruling government or by a party in power, not by an ideology of power, but that is plural and inclusive expression of the whole society with its different manifestations of democracy.

5 .- In education, the draft Law on Education has the same orientation ideologizing indicated, to the detriment of the constitutional design of education governed by freedom of thought, pluralism, tolerance and other democratic values.

6 .- As was the case with the void elimination of constitutional limits on presidential re-election, which always puts the presidential candidate a clear advantage, now wants to reverse another historic achievement of constitutionalism Venezuela as is the principle of proportional representation, based on our electoral system. It was unfortunate that those in power try to close by the Draft Law on Elections, the paths of integration and democratic pluralism Constitution wished to safeguard.

7 .- We observe with great concern the use of threats, coercion, and prosecution as a deterrent against social media, journalists, workers and owners of the media, using the whole government apparatus and the judiciary in order to prevent the report and discuss freely about the country's reality and the problems that afflict many believe it. D e must remember that under the jurisprudence of American Court of Human Rights, the Freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions for its progress and development of every human being. E s applicable not only to "information" or "ideas" that are favorably received or perceived as a matter of indifference, but also those that offend, displease or disturb the State or any sector of the population. These are the demands of pluralism, tolerance and open-mindedness, which imposes a truly democratic society. It is also serious attempt to criminalize the lawyers in the legitimate exercise of their profession, have assumed the defense of people linked to media that are being harassed by the government.

8 .- The constitutional independence of the judiciary is also being affected established under the enactment of the Organic Law Justice System, for the reasons explained in a statement issued by Academy of Political and Social Sciences, and Code of Ethics of Venezuelan Judges and Justice of Venezuela, because subjects judges suitability to control that tends to invade its judicial autonomy, among other reasons. The latter additional regulatory text puts at risk the independence of the lawyers guild, by subjecting its members to the disciplinary authority of the courts therein provided.

9 .- All authentic Constitution imposes limits on the power. The preservation of democracy depends precisely on the observance of all boundaries of form and substance to the exercise of power. Hence the imperative of reconstitucionalización the country that we must all undertake. We urge the convening authorities plural of all political and social sectors, to initiate an early dialogue process encourage the identification of common denominators in a collective effort towards institutional strengthening of Venezuela.

Román Duque Corredor-, Hernández Jesús María Casal,

Eugenio Hernandez-Breton, Inocencio Figueroa ,

José Guillermo Andueza, Rogelio Pérez Perdomo,

Ramón Crazut, Alfredo Morles,

Humberto Njaim , Alberto Arteaga Sanchez,

Enrique Lagrange, José Luis Aguilar,

Alberto

Baumeister, Carlos Leañez Sievert,

Raul Arrieta, Israel Argüello,

Victorino Márquez, Marcos Carrillo,

Alicia Monagas, Gonzalo Himiob,

Freddy J. Orlando, André Carrasquero,

Adolfo Salgueiro , Ruth Capriles,

Adrian Thomas , John William Aveleda,

Enrique Sánchez Falcón, Luis E. Queremel Franco,

Raul A. Queremel Castro, Ludwig Schmidt,

Planchart Pedro, Gustavo Linares Benz

Luis Alfonso Herrera Orellana , Asdrubal Aguiar,

Araujo Ana Elvira, Luis Eduardo Henríquez ,

José Luis Villegas , Milagros Betancourt,

David Gómez Gamboa, Roberto Ruiz Baez,

Parés Alfredo Salas, Carlos Weffe ,

Miriam Rodriguez, Elsa Cardozo ,

Rafael Tobia , José Barnola ,

Eduardo Piacenza , Nelson Socorro,

Isaías Medina, Ninoska Rodríguez Laverde,

Irma Lovera, Norma Perez,

Emilio J.

Urbina Mendoza, Tulio Alvarez,

Liliana Fasciani M., Margarita Escudero,

José Antonio Muci , Angelina Jaffé Carbonell,

Frank Vecchionacce Jorge Faroh,

Carlos Ayala, Natan Zaidman,

Tamara Alter Bechar, Carlos Guillermo Arocha,

Gerardo Fernandez, Elias Bittar ,

Juan Manuel Raffalli , Carolina Pacheco de Ramos,

Maria Helena Fernandes , Luis Oca Arris,

Maoly Carrasquero , Laura washer,

Janesky Lehmann, Gustavo Tarr,

Peter Calvani, Andrés Halvorssen ,

Ricardo Antela , Alma Chacón,

Jesus Maria Alvarado, Thamara Adrian,

D'Ascoli Alexys Pinto, Lourdes Wills,

Luisa Sanchez, Irma Buninow.

Cleaning A White Coat

Statement of the Venezuelan Association of Constitutional Law lawyers

In the last decades of the last century was raised with increasing force, first the possibility and then the need to produce a constitutional change. Various were the proposals offered, was a national debate framed in another that was taking place throughout Latin America on the reforms of the state and republican institutions, in many cases to save democracy, ours to strengthen it. This dynamic of the century culminated in the convening of a National Constituent Assembly in 1999, the product of the Constitution it is force.

While our Constitution is not itself the product of a consensus or a conclusion, it expresses the spirit and the spirit of reform that inspired the debate, both driven COPRE late last century, like the was developed on the occasion of the first discussion in Constituent National Assembly in 1999, and collected and expressed in its content interests and aspirations of various sectors of Venezuelan society who sought institutional change, although there was no consensus, it is a blended formula, expression of a certain understanding, and agreed not systematic, hence the contradictions noted in the text.

's not like some raised, at the time, "a suit made to measure", an instrument created by a sector with hegemonic pretensions to impose on the Venezuelan political regime. It is a legitimate Constitution (with its strengths and weaknesses), approved in a referendum by the Venezuelan people. It is the ultimate rule of the game, or rather, the maximum regulatory instrument for the democratic Venezuela in the current context. As a policy letter is the epitome of the great formal rules of the game. And according to his own text, "... the supreme law and the legal basis ..." and under that Article 7 "... all persons and bodies exercising public powers are subject ... "she

Ours, like any constitution, faces a dilemma, both in the ways in fact of formal the Constitution and the Constitution real, the problem of its validity contradictory formal and real life. But also now faces the contradiction between political system and constitution, in a context of threat to the survival of republican institutions for democracy. Threat expressed in linear form at times, so ambiguous in other, often contradictory ways, guided by a peculiar concept of legality attributed totalitarian regimes by experts, always presented with a rhetorical veil that identifies itself as a revolutionary. Anyway, looks increasingly deplorable development undemocratic practices daily with a democratic constitution.

What initially observed in developing legislation inconsistent with the Constitution, as was the case with laws relating to decentralization and decentralized federal state (FIDES, ESAA, Ports, etc.) Or with failure of the attempt to pass the law of state treasuries, vetoed by the President of the Republic , is expressed more clearly, later in the text of the president's proposal for constitutional reform, augmented by the National Assembly and unproved by the people in referendum in December 2007. Has been approved, it would indeed be "a tailored suit." The force, with its imperfections, is a constitution for a democratic development in a pluralistic environment.

The history of this first decade of the century, reveals a process of concentration of political power which is not enough the current Constitution, it is considered that she already fulfilled its role. Not possible to reform, has been expressly and openly violated, using already mentioned the peculiar way of thinking about law that makes public authorities focused on a single command, interpret, as it has National Assembly and the Supreme Court, that "if you can a way nothing can prevent other "just this simple logic allows for the adoption of the famous 26 decrees with the force of law, the approval of the amendment, and the current passing laws in flagrant contradiction with the Constitution, and even Contrary to what the people decide, in exercise of sovereignty in a referendum act. It is worth remembering that the Case the Supreme Court of Justice in Political Chamber Management in 1999, which gave legitimacy to the floor call National Constituent Assembly, referred to the limitation that the powers that be to amend the Constitution today is acting contrary to this historic decision, power has been formed above the sovereign. And in accordance with Article 333 of the Constitution, the "... Constitution does not lose validity ... because or repeal in any manner other than as provided for therein," so that defense requires the observance of the Constitution , to has led the call for this act, and what is the duty of every citizen of Venezuela.

is why the Venezuelan Association of Constitutional Law is present in the civic and civil act, and will monitor, within the framework of the academic nature that governs it, you do not intend going to the force, both formal and real, of our Constitution, and pursuant to an express civic duty with a sense of pluralism, his opinion.

Gameshark Sp's For Sale

The Guild of Venezuela to the institutional crisis

The Superior Council of the Federation of Bar Associations in view of the serious crisis of legality by which traverses the Republic considers it appropriate to address the public the following approaches: First

. Sometimes the effective power of a society gets its basis for action in different instances of the law. The proceedings of the Executive Branch reliably verify that this is the case of Venezuela. It has supplanted the objective regularity of the law by erratic whims of those who actually hold power, because while it has the legal powers as President, awarded through the respective election is not entitled to act only at the end of will occupy the bodies that are outside their areas of choice. Second

. The division of the bodies or branches of government, giving each a specific powers must be exercised independently, is one of the main features of a democratic regime is a system of mutual control that each body exerts on another. This principle is not respected in the country. Third

. A regime which has as its goal the realization of a democratic state based on legality, and take for himself all the powers of state bodies, is defined as a system characterized by arbitrary rule. Fourth

. The proof of the above with regard to the legislative branch is clearly demonstrated by the passage of legislation by the National Assembly, which formed part of the proposal rejected by the Venezuelan people in the referendum of December 2007. Laws which violate the Constitution neglected the massive popular rejection. Fifth

. Regarding the judiciary, the Supreme Court demonstrates its lack of independence to obey the wishes of the President of the Republic, to recognize the organic nature of the decrees issued by the Executive, although only have this status laws as determined by the Constitution or a majority of two thirds of the National Assembly, according to the Article 203 of the Constitution, conditions exist in these legislative proposals. Among many other things, violate the Constitution because it allows expropriation of property without a warrant for occupancy; politicized the National Armed Forces to be at the service of a single-party political thought, by institutionalizing the ominous theme of content that ends with word "death" creates a new component or armed force: the Bolivarian National Militia. All these abuses from the initiative of the Presidency of the Republic illegally converted into law, instead of being declared unconstitutional were accepted by the Supreme Court, giving the character organic law. This has added the erroneous assimilation of international tribunals with jurisdiction in Venezuela based on valid treaties and conventions with foreign courts simply do not enjoy such status, all in satisfaction with the course isolationist speech of the head of the National Executive. Sixth


. Of the other supposedly independent bodies, highlight the acts issued by the Comptroller General of the Republic, such as prohibitions clearly illegal and unconstitutional policy, citizens who aspired to elective office in the 2008 elections, as it only applies to "... who have been convicted for crimes committed during the course of their duties "under Article 65 of the Constitution, a condition not fulfilled. The Public Prosecutor has shown over and over again its unrestricted obedience to the orders of the President of the Republic, the end justify the anti-institutional approach of ordering proceed to comply with what the President believes it is his duty: "... the President has the power to encourage other state bodies, "was the meek response of the Attorney General. The National Electoral Council has clearly demonstrated a submissive attitude, to the extent that totally ignored the National Assembly the draft electoral law proposed by this body to approve a system of proportional representation which denies the benefit of the scheme. Finally, the Ombudsman, is known as an institution totally irrelevant, given the arbitrary daily demonstrations against citizens by state agencies. Seventh

. The path of social and legal state under Article 2 of the Constitution, is disrupted for a purpose that seeks to impose an authoritarian socialism, imitation of a Marxist-Leninist dictatorship of sponsoring a violent change of government structures. Instead of opting for the alternative of democratic socialism, exemplified in many governments in Latin America and Europe, we chose the route of the illegal imposition of ideas and practices at odds with a regime of freedoms. And the first thing is to make the top executive to meet these aims, is to engage all decision makers, which already achieved proven, making the powers that should control the activity of the Executive, and robots are their obedient staff. Eighth

. This is the first step towards the establishment of a dictatorial regime characterized by irregular and capricious command of who holds power. If we add a country in which huge groups of people living in poverty critical in poverty, that public safety is non-existent, with Venezuela being the most violent country in Latin America, with 14,530 homicides in 2008, that the Executive has ordered the fabulous sum of 830,300 million dollars in the decade although this has had a visible effect on the population, in contrast, formal employment has decreased and our currency suffered a major inflation in the world, that corruption infects every organ mass public wealth to be patent agents who hold high State, which still get the criminal complicity alleged inaction by the Comptroller General, the Public Ministry and the courts justice, which has criminalized the free exercise of the legal profession, qualifying as a simple crime allegations in cases where public interest has been expressed and impudently the President. Before

described: First

. We warn the people of Venezuela on the total illegitimacy which governs the Republic, through policy instruments that do not meet the minimum conditions required by the Constitution and laws. Second

. We urge other professional associations that make life in the country to speak at this grave risk in Venezuela. Third

. Call to establish a campaign, within legal parameters, to demonstrate the reality of the current regime, to the Venezuelan population, which is to be performed on each Bar Association of the Republic, through lectures, seminars, conferences, highlighting the values \u200b\u200bof genuine democracy. Fourth

. Schedule a massive campaign to highlight the importance of will to correct the authoritarianism that prevails in our country, the upcoming elections to the National Assembly, a body that has within its powers to designate the composition of the Supreme Court and appoint the Attorney General, the Comptroller General, the Ombudsman and members of the National Electoral Council. A favorable change toward democratic currents within the National Assembly, is the first step of Venezuela to rescue liberty and the institutional losses.

Blood Vessel Popped On Boob

country

Last Monday, June 29, 2009, at the headquarters of the Casa del Professor Universitario de la Universidad Central de Venezuela (UCV) was released to the public NETWORK DEFENSE OF THE CONSTITUTION.